SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Population-Based Cosmetics Exposure Parameters: Survey Approaches and Cosmetics Usage Results From Different Countries.
Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Population-Based Cosmetics Exposure Parameters: Survey Approaches and Cosmetics Usage Results From Different Countries.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccess to reliable exposure data is critical for conducting risk assessments of ingredients in cosmetic products. Cosmetic usage patterns, including product types, user percentages, daily product numbers, amounts, and frequency of use, can vary significantly across regions, countries, and populations. Therefore, obtaining comprehensive cosmetic usage data and establishing a robust database of exposure parameters are essential for accurately assessing the exposure levels of cosmetic ingredients. PROBLEM STATEMENT: Despite the critical need for exposure data, a systematic review analyzing existing survey approaches and methodologies for cosmetic usage has been lacking.
objectivesThis study aimed to compare cosmetic usage patterns across different regions and countries, systematically summarize survey approaches and methodologies, and obtain accurate and effective cosmetic exposure assessment parameters to facilitate the risk assessment of cosmetic products.
methodsA systematic review approach was used following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and CNKI databases were retrieved in April 2025 for articles published between 2005 and 2025. With a total of 38 publications deemed relevant based on the established inclusion criteria, the following information was extracted: type of study, characteristics of the population (number, age, sex, and region of origin), period of data collection, types of products studied, methods of data collection, and consumption and/or exposure parameters obtained.
resultsThis study reviews surveys on cosmetics consumer exposure parameters conducted by the European Union, the United States, and some Asian countries over the past few decades. It analyzes the differences in research on cosmetics usage patterns across these regions/countries and summarizes domestic and international investigation approaches for cosmetic consumption surveys, including their advantages, disadvantages, and appropriate applications. The results demonstrated the current status of cosmetic usage pattern surveys in different countries/regions. There are differences in cosmetic usage patterns among countries in the European Union, the United States, and some Asian countries. Currently, cosmetics consumption data are mainly divided into qualitative data and quantitative data. Qualitative data include types of products, user usage, usage location, etc. Quantitative data comprise the percentage of users, frequency of use, and amount of cosmetics used (per use and per day), etc. These data were obtained through methods such as questionnaires, weighing approaches, etc. During the investigation, appropriate methods were selected to obtain the corresponding types of data. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this study will provide a valuable reference for initiating future investigations of cosmetics usage and provide a model for subsequent assessments of population exposure to ingredients in cosmetic products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.