Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025356›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2026

Temporal Dynamics of Beta Power Related to the Stun Effect in Parkinson's Disease Patients after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Martijn G J de Neeling, Stijn Geraats, Bart E K S Swinnen, Mariëlle J Stam, Rob M A de Bie, Bernadette C M van Wijk, P Rick Schuurman, Arthur W G Buijink, Martijn Beudel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Navigating the Roadblocks to Clinical Implementation.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Midbrain length by the one-line method predicts motor outcome after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martijn G J de NeelingDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-2505
Stijn GeraatsDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bart E K S SwinnenDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariëlle J StamDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rob M A de BieDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5267-0784
Bernadette C M van WijkDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P Rick SchuurmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Arthur W G BuijinkDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7470-3628
Martijn BeudelDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2488-7051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Early programming of DBS may be complicated by the postoperative "stun effect," which also may impact local field potentials (LFPs).

methodsPercept PC neurostimulators (Medtronic) were used to continuously record LFPs from the STN in 32 PD patients at home during the first 2 months after DBS surgery. Average beta peak power ("beta power") per day was analyzed using change-point analysis.

resultsMedian beta power across patients showed an upward trend with a changepoint 24 to 40 days after surgery. Median beta power directly following DBS activation did not significantly drop but continued to increase beyond the DBS activation visit.

conclusionThe neurophysiological stun effect persists for at least 3 weeks and should be taken into consideration when timing and applying sensing-informed or adaptive DBS based on beta power. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmDeep Brain StimulationParkinson DiseaseSubthalamic NucleusAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBeta activitydeep brain stimulationlocal field potentialsmicrolesionParkinson's diseasestun effect

Identifiers

PMID41025356
PMCPMC12882053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.