ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Predicting Waiting Times for Medical Tasks in a Pediatric Hospital Using Machine Learning: Comprehensive, Retrospective, Real-World Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The shortage of pediatric medical resources and overcrowding in children's hospitals are severe issues in China. Accurately predicting waiting times can help optimize hospital operational efficiency. Objective: This study aims to develop machine learning models to predict waiting times for various laboratory and radiology examinations at a pediatric hospital. Methods: Time stamp data from laboratory and radiology examinations were retrospectively collected from the pediatric hospital information system between November 1, 2024, and March 13, 2025. Two queue-related and 4 time-based features were extracted using queue theory. Linear regression and 8 machine learning models were trained to predict waiting times for each medical task. Hyperparameters were fine-tuned using randomized search and 10-fold cross-validation, and the bootstrap method was used for model evaluation. Mean absolute error, mean square error, root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination (R²) were used as evaluation metrics. Shapley additive explanations values were used to assess feature importance. Results: A total of 230,864 time-stamped records were included after data preprocessing. The median waiting time was 4.817 (IQR 1.867-12.050) minutes for all medical tasks. Waiting times for radiology examinations were generally longer than those for laboratory tests. Tree-based algorithms, such as random forest and classification and regression trees, performed best in predicting laboratory test waiting times, with R² values ranging from mean 0.880(SD 0.003) to mean 0.934 (SD 0.003). However, the machine learning models did not perform well in predicting radiology examination waiting times, with R2 ranging from 0.114 (SD 0.005) to 0.719 (SD 0.004). Feature importance analysis revealed that queue-related predictors, especially the number of queuing patients, were the most important in predicting waiting times. Conclusions: Task-specific prediction models are more appropriate for accurately predicting waiting times across various medical tasks. Guided by queue theory principles, we developed machine learning models for the waiting time prediction of each medical task and highlighted the importance of queue-related predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.