ArticleRadiation oncology journal2025
Radiotherapy omission in low-risk, early-stage breast cancer: a single-center, real-world comparative analysis.
Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy omission in low-risk hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: insights from a Korean single-center cohort.Radiation oncology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and those who did not, in a cohort of patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsPostmenopausal women with pT1N0/Nx, grade 1-2, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, and Ki-67 ≤ 20% breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy between 2010 and 2020 were included. The decision on RT omission was based on physician assessment and patient preference. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes included locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and breast cancer-specific survival.
resultsOf the 742 patients, 707 received adjuvant RT (postoperative radiation therapy [PORT] group) and 35 did not (RT omission group). Baseline characteristics were generally similar; however, the RT omission group was older (median age, 76 years; range, 68 to 85 years) than the PORT group (median age, 62 years; range, 55 to 87 years). After a median follow-up of 60 months in the PORT group and 52 months in the RT omission group, the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence was 1.28% and 0%, respectively (Gray's test, p = 0.305). Locoregional recurrence occurred in seven patients (1.0%) in the PORT group, whereas no locoregional recurrences were observed in the RT omission group. The results remained consistent after propensity score matching.
conclusionLow-risk, early-stage breast cancer patients exhibited comparable disease recurrence and survival rates regardless of the RT status. Our study underscores the necessity for further investigation into RT omission in carefully selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.