ArticleRadiation oncology journal2025
Feasibility study of dose de-escalation in postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced thymoma.
Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate retrospectively the feasibility of reducing the standard postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) dose of 45-50 Gy for locally invasive thymoma to shorten treatment duration and minimize side effects, while preserving disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS). MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween January 2016 and June 2022, 150 locally advanced thymoma patients underwent surgery followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with a median follow-up of 40.8 months; the standard regimen was 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions (median biological effective dose [BED] 60 Gy), compared to a de-escalation regimen of 30-35 Gy in 10 fractions (median BED 47.25 Gy), with PFS as the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS), DSS, and toxicity as secondary endpoints.
resultsNo significant differences were found between standard and de-escalation groups in 3-year PFS (p = 0.406), with both groups achieving 100% 3-year DSS; two deaths in the de-escalation group were due to double primary cancers. All locoregional recurrences occurred outside the radiation field. Factors including age, initial tumor size, myasthenia gravis, and pathological type showed no correlation with PFS or OS. No grade II toxicities occurred in the de-escalation group, whereas the standard group had three cases of grade II toxicity, specifically radiation pneumonitis.
conclusionRadiation dose de-escalation in locally advanced thymoma patients undergoing PORT showed comparable survival outcomes with reduced toxicity and shorter treatment duration, but requires longer follow-up to confirm efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.