Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025240›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental biology2025

A mechanical perspective on suction feeding in fishes.

Ariel L Camp, Sam Van Wassenbergh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ariel L CampDepartment of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Sciences, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3355-4312
Sam Van WassenberghLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5746-4621

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R011109/1University of Antwerp SEP BOF FFB190380University of Liverpool
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suction feeding in fish has long fascinated experimental biologists because of its complex motions, intricate anatomy and vast distribution across thousands of species and nearly every aquatic habitat. Suction feeding poses three main mechanical challenges for fish. First, how do shortening muscles create three-dimensional (3D) expansion of the mouth cavity to suck in water? Second, how do muscles produce the substantial power required for fast and forceful expansion to accelerate food and water into the mouth? Third, how is water moved through the mouth so that food can be deposited in the oesophagus? Over the last 15-20 years, new methods for measuring and modelling bone, muscle and fluid motions have advanced our understanding of how fish meet these three mechanical challenges of suction feeding. In this Review, we examine these advances, primarily through the lens of mechanical power, and highlight understudied areas with exciting new questions. We discuss how skeletal levers and linkages transform and transmit muscle force into 3D mouth cavity expansion. We explain how the power for rapid and forceful expansion is generated primarily by large regions of the body muscles - although, for all feeding muscles, power output depends on how much and how fast the muscles shorten. Finally, we outline the key characteristics of flows outside and inside the mouth, and their implications for food capture and transport. Future research into the interactions of skeletal motion, muscle function and water flows will reveal new insights into suction-feeding morphology, evolution and ecology.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFishesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaMouthMuscle, SkeletalFluid dynamicsMusclePowerSkeletal linkage

Identifiers

PMID41025240
PMCPMC12517347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.