Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025070›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Application of deep learning-based convolutional neural networks in gastrointestinal disease endoscopic examination.

Yang-Yang Wang, Bin Liu, Ji-Han Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang-Yang WangSchool of Physics and Electronic Information, Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi Province, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430079, Hubei Province, China.
Ji-Han WangYan'an Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi Province, China. jihanwang@yau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, including gastric and colorectal cancers, significantly impact global health, necessitating accurate and efficient diagnostic methods. Endoscopic examination is the primary diagnostic tool; however, its accuracy is limited by operator dependency and interobserver variability. Advancements in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), show great potential for enhancing GI disease detection and classification. This review explores the application of CNNs in endoscopic imaging, focusing on polyp and tumor detection, disease classification, endoscopic ultrasound, and capsule endoscopy analysis. We discuss the performance of CNN models with traditional diagnostic methods, highlighting their advantages in accuracy and real-time decision support. Despite promising results, challenges remain, including data availability, model interpretability, and clinical integration. Future directions include improving model generalization, enhancing explainability, and conducting large-scale clinical trials. With continued advancements, CNN-powered artificial intelligence systems could revolutionize GI endoscopy by enhancing early disease detection, reducing diagnostic errors, and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal DiseasesCapsule EndoscopyConvolutional Neural NetworksEarly Detection of CancerEndosonographyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerComputer-aided diagnosisConvolutional neural networksDeep learningEndoscopic examinationGastrointestinal diseases

Identifiers

PMID41025070
PMCPMC12476647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.