ReviewWorld journal of radiology2025
Complications and expected imaging findings after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Review in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a cornerstone procedure for the diagnosis and management of pancreatic and hepatobiliary diseases. Although its diagnostic role has been increasingly supplanted by noninvasive imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, the therapeutic applications of ERCP have continued to expand. ERCP is widely used and has a generally favorable safety profile. However, it is important to recognize expected post-procedural imaging findings and serious complications that can arise. The increasing complexity of therapeutic interventions and the growing volume of procedures have led to a higher incidence of complications that often present with overlapping clinical and laboratory features, underscoring the critical role of imaging in differential diagnosis. This review focused on the typical normal ERCP findings and the imaging characteristics of common complications, including pancreatitis, bleeding, ERCP-related infections, perforations, and stent-related complications. Computed tomography (CT) is particularly valuable in timely recognition, management, and surgical decision-making for these complications. Furthermore, MRI offers a radiation-free alternative for managing complications in selected patients. Therefore, radiological modalities, particularly CT and MRI, are critical tools for the rapid diagnosis, management, and surgical decision-making processes for post-ERCP complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.