ArticleWorld journal of radiology2025
Value of endometrial peristalsis analysis technique in detecting and analyzing endometrial peristalsis features.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial peristalsis (EmP) has been considered as a new indicator for evaluating endometrial receptivity and is associated with embryo implantation rate and successful pregnancy rate. However, EmP remains understudied, inconsistently measured, and poorly understood. New methods are needed urgently for better clinical practice.
aimTo explore the value of EmP analysis (EmPA) technique in detecting and analyzing EmP features automatically and quantitatively.
methodsOne hundred and forty-five patients without abnormal findings on conventional transvaginal ultrasound were included in this study. A mid sagittal plane of uterus was recorded for 2 minutes in each patient and EmP features were analyzed using EmPA technique. EmP features in 50 patients were also analyzed by naked eyes analysis and the results of two methods were compared.
resultsEmPA was unsuccessful in 9 patients (9/145, 6.21%) due to the interference of respiratory or intestinal movement and was successful in 136 patients (136/145, 93.79%), of whom 21 patients showed no EmP and 115 patients underwent EmPA and obtained quantitative results. The results of EmPA technique and naked eyes analysis about EmP intensity and transfer time had no significant consistence. Menstrual cycle, uterine position and history of induced abortion affected the quantitative results of EmPA.
conclusionEmPA technique provides noninvasive, quantitative and accurate detection and analysis of EmP in normal population and can evaluate EmP changes associated with menstrual cycle, uterine position and history of induced abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.