ArticleWorld journal of radiology2025
Advances in ultrasound-based imaging for diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Comprehensive Cross-Cancer Translational Readiness Analysis Across 18 Malignancies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Deep learning prediction model based on multi-modal transvaginal ultrasound scan images for endometrial cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Development and clinical evaluation of an ultrasound-based predictive model for early diagnosis of endometrial cancer.Medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of cervical stromal invasion using ultrasound radiomics: from conventional ultrasound to intelligent diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Endometrial Hyperplasia: Current Insights into Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Management.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in high-income countries, with incidence rates rising globally. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for improving outcomes. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) remains a cost-effective first-line tool, and emerging techniques such as three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), elastography, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced imaging may further improve diagnostic performance.
aimTo systematically review recent advances in US-based imaging techniques for the diagnosis and staging of EC, and to compare their performance with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies published between January 2010 and March 2025. Eligible studies evaluated TVUS, 3D-US, CEUS, elastography, or AI-enhanced US in EC diagnosis and staging. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted where available, with narrative synthesis due to heterogeneity.
resultsForty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. TVUS demonstrated high sensitivity (76%-96%) but moderate specificity (61%-86%), while MRI achieved higher specificity (84%-95%) and superior staging accuracy. 3D-US yielded accuracy comparable to MRI in selected early-stage cases. CEUS and elastography enhanced tissue characterization, and AI-enhanced US achieved pooled AUCs up to 0.91 for risk prediction and lesion segmentation. Variability in performance was noted across modalities due to patient demographics, equipment differences, and operator experience.
conclusionTVUS remains a highly sensitive initial screening tool, with MRI preferred for definitive staging. 3D-US, CEUS, elastography, and AI-enhanced techniques show promise as complementary or alternative approaches, particularly in low-resource settings. Standardization, multicenter validation, and integration of multi-modal imaging are needed to optimize diagnostic pathways for EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.