ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2026
Critical illness and recovery-learning from the shared experience of survivors and their families: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Improved survival from critical illness in recent years has led to an increase in patients with Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). Routine, dedicated, specific and individualised assessment, rehabilitation and follow-up after critical care discharge is recommended but is currently inadequate in the UK. The aim of this study was to explore patients' and family members' experiences of a critical care admission, focussing on recovery and rehabilitation. Methods: As part of an intervention development programme, a series of iterative focus groups with survivors of critical illness and their family members was held. Parallel groups with staff involved in the care and rehabilitation of critically ill patients were also conducted. Participants mapped out their recovery journey identifying key moments and challenges and shared their recommendations for recovery and rehabilitation. Brokered dialogue was used to enable patient and staff groups to ask and answer questions of each other. Data analysis was completed using reflexive thematic coding. Results: Thirty-four participants attended the focus groups, with 28 attending the first two groups discussed in this paper. Using the experiences described by the participants, three overarching themes were identified; fear, helplessness and frustration. Participants also reported both short and longer-term consequences of ICU admission and shared their priorities and advice for recovery and rehabilitation. Conclusion: Critical care admission is a traumatic experience for patients and family members. Our data highlights patients' needs for ongoing, holistic support during a stay in critical care and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.