ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Identifying Priority Habitats for Dung Beetle Conservation: Taxonomic and Functional Responses Across a Land-Use Disturbance Gradient.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Priority Habitats for Dung Beetle Conservation: Taxonomic and Functional Responses Across a Land-Use Disturbance Gradient.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities are causing a decline in dung beetles due to land-use change and overexploitation. This underscores the need for their conservation, for which identification of high-priority habitats and associated species is necessary. To achieve this, this study evaluated taxonomic and functional diversity across various land-use types and dung types. Field experiments were conducted using dung-baited pitfall traps set up in different land-use types along a disturbance gradient: built environments, agricultural fields, coniferous forests, and deciduous forests. The traps were baited with wild boar, cattle, and leopard cat dung. With this data, the changes in taxonomic and functional diversity indices were explored. The results indicated that deciduous forests were the most important habitat in most instances, except for small dung beetles and dwellers, which favored agricultural fields. Regarding dung type, wild boar dung was preferred in all cases, with a significantly lower preference for cattle and leopard cat dung. This study utilized multiple indices to identify high-priority habitats and associated species, emphasizing the significance of deciduous forests, agricultural fields, and wild boar for the conservation of dung beetles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.