Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024993›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

An eDNA Survey of Plant Biodiversity in a Local Dam Within South Africa's Largest City.

N Nhlengethwa, R D Stewart, A Emami-Khoyi, P R Teske, S Csányi, M Heltai, M van der Bank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N NhlengethwaAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology University of Johannesburg Auckland Park South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9205-373X
R D StewartAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology University of Johannesburg Auckland Park South Africa.
A Emami-KhoyiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Department of Wildlife Biology and Management Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
P R TeskeCentre for Ecological Genomic and Wildlife Conservation University of Johannesburg Auckland Park South Africa.
S CsányiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Department of Wildlife Biology and Management Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
M HeltaiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Department of Wildlife Biology and Management Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
M van der BankAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology University of Johannesburg Auckland Park South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems within cities can play a crucial role in conserving local biodiversity amid rapidly expanding urban sprawl, but they face significant threats from anthropogenic activities and the introduction of alien invasive species (AIS). A comprehensive management plan is required to effectively preserve the biodiversity supported by urban ecosystems. However, the ecological information needed to establish, implement and monitor such plans is often incomplete. In this study, we assessed the application of eDNA metabarcoding in surveying plant biodiversity in an aquatic habitat by collecting water samples at five sites in an urban dam in the City of Johannesburg. Out of 1001 reconstructed Amplicon Sample Variants (ASVs), plant taxa were assigned to 47 unique taxonomic ranks at the family level, 42 unique ranks at the generic level and only 13 unique ranks at the species level (including three AIS). The remaining ASVs could only be identified at higher taxonomic ranks, indicating that no DNA barcodes have yet been generated for the putative species in question. Although this study provides a good overview of plant community structure, it also highlights a gap in the taxonomic coverage of South African plants on public DNA databases. To address this shortcoming, increased national DNA barcoding efforts are needed to expand current reference databases. This will be indispensable for the effective application of eDNA metabarcoding in studying South Africa's unique biodiversity.

Indexed as

biodiversityDNA barcodingenvironmental DNA (eDNA)freshwaterinvasive speciesmetabarcodingSouth Africaurban ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID41024993
PMCPMC12476927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.