Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024982›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology2025

Comparison of gastric emptying of solid and semi-solid meals using real-time ultrasonography in healthy Sri Lankan adults.

Lakmali Amarasiri, Minerva de Silva, Hithanadura Janaka de Silva, Niranga M Devanarayana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lakmali AmarasiriDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 80000, Western Province, Sri Lanka.
Minerva de SilvaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.
Hithanadura Janaka de SilvaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama 11010, Western Province, Sri Lanka.
Niranga M DevanarayanaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama 11010, Western, Sri Lanka. niranga@kln.ac.lk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine assessment of solid gastric emptying is challenging due to the prolonged test duration and complex meal preparation. Replacing solid test meals with easily prepared, commercially available semisolid meals and shortening the test duration can significantly enhance the feasibility and practicality of gastric emptying evaluations.

aimTo compare the gastric emptying and antral motility of solid

methodsThirty healthy volunteers (17 males, age: 29.4 ± 6.0 years, body mass index: 23.4 ± 2.94 and 13 females, age: 37.2 ± 11.9 years, body mass index: 22.9 ± 4.34) underwent gastric emptying by real-time ultrasonography after a solid meal and a comparable commercially prepared semi-solid meal (each meal, total calorie 350 kcal, carbohydrates 60%, fat 30% and proteins 10%), on separate dates 1 week apart. The gastric antral area was measured at 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes, 210 minutes, and 240 minutes post-ingestion using a previously validated technique and compared between meals.

resultsMean and median antral areas, gastric emptying rates, gastric residual ratios, and motility index at each time point were almost similar between meals for up to 3 hours. At the end of 4 hours, the mean emptied percentage of the semisolid meal and solid meal was 81.1% and 70.6%, respectively. The emptying rate of the semisolid meal at 90 minutes significantly correlated with that of 240 minutes. There was no correlation between the solid meal emptying rates at 90 minutes and 240 minutes.

conclusionGastric emptying, residual antral cross-sectional area and antral motility of a semisolid meal are almost similar to that of a solid meal of the same nutritional value until three hours post-ingestion. A semisolid test meal can effectively substitute a solid test meal during ultrasound assessment of gastric emptying, without compromising the validity of the results. Additionally, the ease of preparation and administration of semisolid meals enhances the overall feasibility of gastric emptying assessments.

Indexed as

Antral motilityGastric emptyingGastric residual ratioReal-time ultrasonographySemi-solid mealSolid meal

Identifiers

PMID41024982
PMCPMC12476634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.