Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024969›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2025

Gender-based radiation exposure and clinical outcomes in peripheral endovascular intervention for limb ischemia: A prospective study.

Subrata Kar, Clifton Espinoza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Subrata KarDivision of Cardiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States. skar762@aim.com.
Clifton EspinozaDivision of Cardiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.

aimTo investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.

methodsA prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (

resultsMen showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m

conclusionMen had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.

Indexed as

Acute limb ischemiaChronic total occlusionCritical limb ischemiaEndovascular interventionPeripheral arterial diseasePeripheral vascular diseaseRadiationVascular accessVenous occlusion

Identifiers

PMID41024969
PMCPMC12476585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.