ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2025
Streamlining heart failure patient care with machine learning of thoracic cavity sound data.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in heart failure.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Together, the heart and lung sound comprise the thoracic cavity sound, which provides informative details that reflect patient conditions, particularly heart failure (HF) patients. However, due to the limitations of human hearing, a limited amount of information can be auscultated from thoracic cavity sounds. With the aid of artificial intelligence-machine learning, these features can be analyzed and aid in the care of HF patients. Machine learning of thoracic cavity sound data involves sound data pre-processing by denoising, resampling, segmentation, and normalization. Afterwards, the most crucial step is feature extraction and selection where relevant features are selected to train the model. The next step is classification and model performance evaluation. This review summarizes the currently available studies that utilized different machine learning models, different feature extraction and selection methods, and different classifiers to generate the desired output. Most studies have analyzed the heart sound component of thoracic cavity sound to distinguish between normal and HF patients. Additionally, some studies have aimed to classify HF patients based on thoracic cavity sounds in their entirety, while others have focused on risk stratification and prognostic evaluation of HF patients using thoracic cavity sounds. Overall, the results from these studies demonstrate a promisingly high level of accuracy. Therefore, future prospective studies should incorporate these machine learning models to expedite their integration into daily clinical practice for managing HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.