ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2025
Saliva as a non-invasive biomarker for chronic kidney disease: Challenges and potential in disease monitoring.
Review in World journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saliva-based monitoring of chronic kidney disease: comparative evaluation of three collection methods for creatinine, urea, calcium, and PTH.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Breath ammonia test for chronic kidney disease screening: impact of fasting on diagnostic accuracy.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a degenerative disorder that affects millions of people throughout the world, causing considerable morbidity and healthcare burden. Frequent blood sampling is the current gold standard for monitoring CKD to evaluate biochemical and mineral indicators. However, there are drawbacks to frequent blood draws, such as pain for patients, the possibility of infection, and higher medical expenses. Saliva-based diagnostics offer advantages such as ease of collection, reduced invasiveness, and improved patient compliance. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze studies evaluating the diagnostic utility of salivary creatinine, urea, calcium, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with CKD. Various saliva collection methods, including stimulated and unstimulated approaches, were investigated for efficiency and reliability, and a correlation was shown between serum and salivary creatinine, urea, PTH, and calcium levels, indicating their potential as CKD biomarkers. Despite these promising findings, challenges such as standardization of collection methods, variability in salivary flow rates, and predictive value in association with blood parameters are addressed to ensure clinical applicability. This review explores the potential and challenges of saliva as a non-invasive alternative for CKD diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.