ArticleHealth services insights2025
Confidence in Medical Device Calibration Knowledge and Skills Among Healthcare Professionals in Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calibration of medical devices is vital for diagnostic reliability, quality healthcare delivery and patient safety. While awareness is critical, the confidence of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in calibration-related knowledge significantly influences adherence to best practices in calibration-related tasks. However, this area is underexplored in sub-Saharan Africa. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the confidence levels of HCPs in Ghana regarding their calibration-related knowledge and competencies. It examined how these vary by professional role, training status, and years of experience. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 461 HCPs in Ghana, including doctors, nurses, midwives and technicians/clinical engineers, using a structured questionnaire covering five thematic areas: general understanding of calibration knowledge, knowledge of calibration procedures, device-specific knowledge, training and institutional support, and the perceived impact on patient care. Results: Statistical analyses revealed variations in sentiment scores across profession, experience levels and training status. Technicians/clinical engineers consistently reported higher confidence, while doctors, nurses and midwives scored significantly lower. Additionally, respondents with prior calibration training, regardless of experience level, showed substantially greater confidence than their untrained counterparts. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the need for targeted, hands-on calibration training and continuous professional development to improve confidence and competencies in calibration practices. Such initiatives are essential for effective device management and overall healthcare system performance. This study offers evidence to guide policy improvements and capacity-building efforts to strengthen calibration knowledge and practices in Ghana's healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.