ArticleCureus2025
Multiple Placental Abruptions With Fetal Loss: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk for negative outcomes in a pregnancy increases substantially when the placenta disconnects from the endometrial lining too soon before birth. This serious complication in obstetrics is known as placental abruption. Here, we describe a 39-year-old G5P4003 patient at 32 weeks of gestation who presented to the emergency department complaining of absent fetal movement and abdominal pain. Her medical history was notable for multiple high-risk factors, including a past placental abruption with fetal demise, requiring cesarean delivery at 39 weeks. She reported taking her antihypertensive medications consistently but admitted she had missed her most recent prenatal appointment. The emergency ultrasound confirmed a repeat abruption. The patient in this case had many risk factors for placental abruption, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia, and advanced maternal age, as well as a previous pregnancy resulting in an abruption with fetal demise. High-risk patients such as these need to work closely with their medical team and follow the recommended guidelines to have the best chance of a healthy delivery. Still, this case exposes weaknesses in the current protocols for delivery timing and monitoring of high-risk pregnancies, as well as highlighting the importance of thorough patient education. Further research is needed to develop improved evidence-based recommendations for the best management practices, delivery schedules, and risk stratification in pregnancies at high risk of abruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.