Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024907›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Epidemiological and Clinical Evidence on the Association Between Wildfire PM2.5 and Pulmonary Health Outcomes.

Shaheen Rizly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Respiratory Emergencies in Disasters: A Narrative Review.Thoracic research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shaheen RizlyInternal Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, New York City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As climate change accelerates the frequency and severity of wildfires worldwide, the pulmonary consequences of wildfire smoke exposure have emerged as an important yet under-recognized public health concern. Wildfire-related fine particulate matter (PM2.5) possesses distinct toxicologic properties compared to urban PM2.5 and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including children, older adults, and individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. This narrative review synthesizes current epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical evidence on the impact of wildfire PM2.5 on exacerbations and progression of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (ILD), drawing from recent large-scale meta-analyses and international cohort studies. We reviewed data from over 30 peer-reviewed sources, including longitudinal cohorts, systematic reviews, environmental modeling studies, and public health guidelines. Special attention was given to pediatric populations, the elderly, and patients with pre-existing pulmonary conditions. Wildfire PM2.5 is consistently associated with significant increases in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for asthma and COPD, with relative risks often exceeding those of urban PM2.5. Pediatric asthma-related visits may increase by over 30% during wildfire events, while elderly COPD patients face heightened hospitalization and mortality risks. ILD patients, especially those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), exhibit higher rates of acute exacerbations and accelerated disease progression with PM2.5 levels as low as 8-10 μg/m³. Mechanistically, wildfire PM2.5 promotes oxidative stress, epithelial injury, and immune dysregulation, contributing to disease exacerbation and chronic progression. Preventive interventions such as high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration, indoor sheltering, and respiratory protection significantly reduce PM2.5 exposure and related morbidity. Wildfire PM2.5 is a potent and growing contributor to pulmonary morbidity, with a higher toxicity profile than other ambient air pollutants. While acute impacts are well-documented, long-term consequences remain understudied. Urgent research is needed to define chronic health outcomes, develop interventions, and inform public health policy. As wildfires become more frequent and intense globally, clinicians must be prepared to recognize and manage the growing burden of wildfire-related pulmonary disease.

Indexed as

asthma exacerbationschronic lung diseaseclimate changecopd outcomesild progressionpm2.5 exposurepulmonary healthsmoke inhalationwildfire air pollutionwildfire smoke

Identifiers

PMID41024907
PMCPMC12476873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.