ReviewCureus2025
Epidemiological and Clinical Evidence on the Association Between Wildfire PM2.5 and Pulmonary Health Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Emergencies in Disasters: A Narrative Review.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Effects of wildfire smoke exposure on health parameters and inflammatory responses of beef-on-dairy calves.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As climate change accelerates the frequency and severity of wildfires worldwide, the pulmonary consequences of wildfire smoke exposure have emerged as an important yet under-recognized public health concern. Wildfire-related fine particulate matter (PM2.5) possesses distinct toxicologic properties compared to urban PM2.5 and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including children, older adults, and individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. This narrative review synthesizes current epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical evidence on the impact of wildfire PM2.5 on exacerbations and progression of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (ILD), drawing from recent large-scale meta-analyses and international cohort studies. We reviewed data from over 30 peer-reviewed sources, including longitudinal cohorts, systematic reviews, environmental modeling studies, and public health guidelines. Special attention was given to pediatric populations, the elderly, and patients with pre-existing pulmonary conditions. Wildfire PM2.5 is consistently associated with significant increases in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for asthma and COPD, with relative risks often exceeding those of urban PM2.5. Pediatric asthma-related visits may increase by over 30% during wildfire events, while elderly COPD patients face heightened hospitalization and mortality risks. ILD patients, especially those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), exhibit higher rates of acute exacerbations and accelerated disease progression with PM2.5 levels as low as 8-10 μg/m³. Mechanistically, wildfire PM2.5 promotes oxidative stress, epithelial injury, and immune dysregulation, contributing to disease exacerbation and chronic progression. Preventive interventions such as high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration, indoor sheltering, and respiratory protection significantly reduce PM2.5 exposure and related morbidity. Wildfire PM2.5 is a potent and growing contributor to pulmonary morbidity, with a higher toxicity profile than other ambient air pollutants. While acute impacts are well-documented, long-term consequences remain understudied. Urgent research is needed to define chronic health outcomes, develop interventions, and inform public health policy. As wildfires become more frequent and intense globally, clinicians must be prepared to recognize and manage the growing burden of wildfire-related pulmonary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.