Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024897›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Landmark-Guided Pericardiocentesis Simulator for Resource-Limited Procedural Training: A Development Informed by Prior Techniques.

Brian F Quach, Alexander S Hayden, Shayne J Welsh, Andrew Eyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian F QuachSchool of Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, USA.
Alexander S HaydenSchool of Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, USA.
Shayne J WelshSchool of Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, USA.
Andrew EyreEmergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericardial tamponade is defined as a medical emergency where the pericardium of the heart fills with fluid, compressing and preventing it from pumping blood efficiently. If left untreated, progressive hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest would occur. The management of this clinical condition necessitates a pericardiocentesis, which is the aspiration of fluid from the pericardial sac. For high-acuity, low-occurrence scenarios like this, medical simulation provides a psychologically safe environment to practice advanced emergency procedures such as pericardiocentesis. However, due to financial and supply chain constraints, it may be difficult to ensure adequate access to training simulators for clinicians practicing in remote and rural areas. To address this issue and to support skill acquisition for clinicians practicing in these areas, we designed a cost-effective and reusable pericardiocentesis trainer, building upon prior methods using ballistic gels as the medium for model making. The simulator is designed to allow adequate practice of both landmark-guided and ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis from the three main approaches (substernal, apical, and parasternal).

Indexed as

accessible medical simulationemergency medicine proceduresemergency pericardiocentesislandmark-guided pericardiocentesislow-income resource-limited countriesmedicine in resource limited areasresource-limited hospitalresource limited settingrural emergency medicineteaching in emergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID41024897
PMCPMC12476870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.