ArticleCureus2025
Core Endurance in University-Level Fast Bowlers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Fast bowling in cricket involves repetitive, high-velocity trunk movements that increase lumbar spine stress, making core endurance critical for spinal stability, bowling efficiency, and injury prevention. This study aimed to assess core endurance and lateral asymmetries in university-level fast bowlers. Methods Forty-two healthy male university fast bowlers (mean age: 20.19 ± 1.50 years), including 39 right-arm (92.9%) and three left-arm (7.1%) bowlers, who trained ≥3 times per week, participated in the study. The McGill Torso Endurance Test was employed to evaluate flexor, extensor, and lateral core endurance. Hold times were recorded, and descriptive statistics with paired and independent t-tests analyzed asymmetries. Results Mean core endurance times were 103.86 ± 23.91 seconds (flexor), 56.66 ± 11.94 seconds (extensor), 92.49 ± 26.79 seconds (right plank), and 79.56 ± 23.19 seconds (left plank). Compared to McGill norms (144 seconds, flexor; 146 seconds, extensor), participants showed reduced endurance, especially posteriorly. A significant lateral asymmetry was found, with 38 bowlers (90.5%) exhibiting longer hold times on the dominant side (mean difference = 12.92 seconds; p<0.001). Right-arm bowlers had greater right-side endurance, while the numerically smaller left-arm subgroup showed an opposite trend, though the differences were not statistically significant under unequal variance assumptions. Conclusions University-level fast bowlers demonstrated notable deficits in core endurance and significant side-to-side asymmetry favoring the dominant side, likely reflecting sport-specific adaptations. These findings underscore the need for targeted core conditioning, including unilateral training, to enhance spinal stability, reduce injury risk, and support bowling performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.