ArticleJournal of sickle cell disease2025
Clinician attitudes toward palliative care to enhance the quality of life for patients with sickle cell disease.
Article in Journal of sickle cell disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Palliative care (PC) is rare for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). This study evaluated clinician attitudes toward PC for SCD. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2022 and February 2023. Clinicians were recruited from institutions across the United States. Results: Eighty-six participants completed the survey. Most were physicians (90%), female (72%), had >10 years of experience (63%), and lacked prior PC training (57%). Most participants agreed (83%) that patients with SCD would benefit from PC, disagreed (99%) that PC is only for dying patients, and expressed interest (91%) in learning about PC interventions. Clinicians with prior PC training were more likely to agree that patients with SCD would benefit from PC ( Conclusion: Clinicians caring for patients with SCD recognize the potential benefits of PC, although they are unsure about patient responses to PC referrals. Collaborative care teams of SCD and PC specialists are rare. Educating clinicians and patients with SCD about PC is urgently needed to encourage greater collaboration among care teams, particularly in outpatient settings. Strengthened collaborations between SCD and PC specialists could enhance holistic support and quality of life for patients with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.