Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024864›Full record

ArticleJournal of sickle cell disease2025

Altered cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity in sickle cell disease.

Daniel M Sop, Yue May Zhang, Wally R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sickle cell disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel M SopDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine & Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219-0306, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-8319
Yue May ZhangDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219-0306, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9685-7444
Wally R SmithDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219-0306, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4122-5367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) often experience cognitive deficits and chronic pain, but the cerebral mechanisms underlying these symptoms remain unclear. Elevated cerebral blood flow (CBF) is a compensatory response to anemia, yet its impact on brain function and perception is not well understood. Objective: To examine alterations in cerebral perfusion and resting-state brain function in adults with SCD and their associations with cognition and pain sensitivity. Methods: Seven adults with SCD and 3 healthy controls underwent arterial spin labeling (ASL) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). Metrics included global/regional CBF, resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF). Participants completed NIH Toolbox fluid cognition tests and the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). Results: SCD patients exhibited significantly higher global CBF (72.1 vs. 47.2 mL/100g/min; Conclusions: Adults with SCD demonstrate cerebral hyperperfusion, disrupted functional connectivity, and altered spontaneous brain activity, which may contribute to cognitive slowing and heightened pain sensitivity. These findings highlight the need for further research into brain-targeted therapies in SCD.

Indexed as

cerebral blood flowcognitive impairmentfunctional connectivityresting-state fMRIsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID41024864
PMCPMC12476913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.