ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research
Older People's Voices Matter!: Possibilities and Limitations for Providing Dignified Palliative Care with Wearable Devices.
Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to gain insight into the phenomenon of how wearable devices affect the sense of dignity of older patients (above 65 years of age) in palliative care settings using remote monitoring health services. Five interviews were carried out using reflective lifeworld research approach. A phenomenological analysis showed that the essence of older adults' sense of dignity in palliative care is vulnerable and, therefore, at stake when using wearable devices for remote monitoring. This essence is reflected in the following constituents: a simultaneous sense of regained and diminished quality of life; mixed feelings ranging from strengthened self-identity and independence to vulnerability and dependence; shifting care responsibilities within the context of life's finitude; and uncertainty about being valued, seen, and empowered while navigating relational expectations. The phenomenon was illuminated through the lens of various forms of dignity, offering insight into how it is experienced and challenged. These findings underscore the importance of recognising and addressing threats to dignity as digital health technologies continue to evolve in palliative care settings. Interprofessional collaboration among various stakeholders, including patients as active informants and participants, is necessary for designing future dignified remote care using wearable devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.