Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024848›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2025

Role of artificial intelligence in screening and medical imaging of precancerous gastric diseases.

Sergey M Kotelevets

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sergey M KotelevetsDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine, North Caucasus State Academy, Cherkessk 369000, Karachay-Cherkess Republic, Russia. smkotelevets@mail.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serological screening, endoscopic imaging, morphological visual verification of precancerous gastric diseases and changes in the gastric mucosa are the main stages of early detection, accurate diagnosis and preventive treatment of gastric precancer. Laboratory - serological, endoscopic and histological diagnostics are carried out by medical laboratory technicians, endoscopists, and histologists. Human factors have a very large share of subjectivity. Endoscopists and histologists are guided by the descriptive principle when formulating imaging conclusions. Diagnostic reports from doctors often result in contradictory and mutually exclusive conclusions. Erroneous results of diagnosticians and clinicians have fatal consequences, such as late diagnosis of gastric cancer and high mortality of patients. Effective population serological screening is only possible with the use of machine processing of laboratory test results. Currently, it is possible to replace subjective imprecise description of endoscopic and histological images by a diagnostician with objective, highly sensitive and highly specific visual recognition using convolutional neural networks with deep machine learning. There are many machine learning models to use. All machine learning models have predictive capabilities. Based on predictive models, it is necessary to identify the risk levels of gastric cancer in patients with a very high probability.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAtrophic gastritisConvolutional neural networksDeep machine learningMedical imagingPrecancerous gastric diseasesRisk of gastric cancerSerological screening

Identifiers

PMID41024848
PMCPMC12476598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.