ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Meta-analysis of the impact of prehabilitation on patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal tract tumor surgery.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC), including esophageal and gastric cancers, poses a major global health challenge due to its high morbidity and mortality. During the preoperative period, patients often face functional decline, malnutrition, and psychological stress, which can impair recovery. Prehabilitation, a multidisciplinary preoperative intervention, shows promise in optimizing patients' physical and mental status.
aimTo evaluate the impact of prehabilitation on patients undergoing UGIC surgery and provide a basis for implementation of the prehabilitation compound plan.
methodsA computerized search of databases including Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database was used to collect clinical trials on the impact of prehabilitation on patients undergoing UGIC surgery. After screening, a meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.0 software, and linear regression analysis was performed on the prehabilitation duration and outcome indicators.
resultsA total of 13 clinical trials were ultimately included, with 8 literature quality evaluations at A level and 5 literature quality evaluations at B level. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with conventional nursing, the prehabilitation group had higher six-minute walk distance, lower postoperative complications and mortality rates, and shorter hospital stays, with statistically significant differences; there were no statistically significant differences in intensive care unit monitoring time and albumin levels between the two groups; regression analysis between prehabilitation duration and outcome indicators showed no significant relationship.
conclusionPrehabilitation can improve the perioperative functional ability of patients with UGIC and promote postoperative recovery, but its impact on nutrition, psychology, and quality of life needs to be further explored through more high-quality trials; in addition, further research is needed on the prehabilitation time, location, and specific plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.