ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Path analysis the influence of self-efficacy and professional identity on attitudes toward prescriptive authority among oncology nurse specialists.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal tumor incidence rises and therapies advance, driving oncology nursing specialization. Granting nurses prescriptive authority optimizes care but polarizes nurses' attitudes due to factors like risk and competence, hindering policy implementation.
aimTo investigate the current status of the attitudes of oncology specialist nurses toward having prescribing authority, specifically concerning symptom management and supportive care in oncology practice, and we conducted a path analysis of their influencing factors.
methodsAs participants in the survey, oncology specialist nurses working in hospitals of different grades in Jiangsu Province were selected from March 2025 to May 2025 using a stratified sampling method. The questionnaires were administered using the general information questionnaire, the beliefs and attitudes about nurses' prescriptive authority scale, the nurses' professional identity scale, and the self-efficacy scale. Pearson's method was used to analyze the correlation between beliefs and attitudes about the prescriptive authority, professional identity, and self-efficacy of nurses. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyze the factors influencing the beliefs and attitudes of nurses' prescriptive authority. The Amos plug-in was used to construct structural equation models to analyze the influencing pathways.
resultsA total of 329 questionnaires were distributed, and 328 valid questionnaires were returned (effective recovery rate: 99.70%). The total score of the 328 oncology nurses on the beliefs and attitudes about nurses' prescriptive authority scale was 101.88 ± 15.13, indicating a moderately high level. Univariate analysis revealed that gender and hospital grade were associated with this score (
conclusionOncology nurses have more positive attitudes toward prescriptive authority. In addition, self-efficacy positively and indirectly affects nurses' attitudes toward prescriptive authority through the mediating effect of occupational identity. This can be used as a basis for clinical practice to take targeted measures to improve nurses' self-efficacy and occupational identity, thus creating favorable conditions for effectively implementing the policy of prescriptive authority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.