ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Effects of rapid recovery nursing after surgery in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the primary treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis. Although rapid recovery nursing is commonly implemented in postoperative care, its effect on acute calculous cholecystitis after LC remains unclear.
aimTo analyze the impact of rapid recovery nursing in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis undergoing LC.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted with a total of 120 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent LC at our hospital between October 2023 and October 2024. The patients were divided into two groups with 60 patients in each group according to the different nursing methods: Conventional nursing and rapid recovery nursing groups. Data was recorded from the electronic medical records. Gastrointestinal recovery, pain, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after nursing.
resultsFollowing nursing intervention, the visual analog scale scores on Days 3 and 7 post-surgery in the rapid recovery nursing group were notably lower than those of the conventional nursing group (
conclusionRapid recovery nursing effectively promoted the recovery of gastrointestinal function, reducing pain and improving the quality of life of patients who underwent LC for acute calculous cholecystitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.