ReviewThe journal of medicine access
Assessing the performance of local pharmaceutical systems: An analytical approach to improve access to medicine.
Review in The journal of medicine access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local systems, local solutions: which factors drive essential medicine availability in public health facilities across Indonesia?BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Managing medicines in decentralization: discrepancies between national policies and local practices in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well-functioning pharmaceutical systems are crucial for ensuring universal access to medicines and their appropriate use. While existing frameworks for analysing pharmaceutical systems generally focus on the national level, in many countries, the core functions are often managed locally within a broader national framework. Despite this local focus, there has been no effort to conceptualize a 'local pharmaceutical system' as a distinct entity with its own goals, functions and operational components. A method for analysing and comparing the performance of local pharmaceutical systems (LOPHAS) within a country is still lacking. We aim to develop an analytical approach and framework to assess the performance of LOPHAS and guide improvements in access to essential medicines. We conducted an integrative literature review and consulted with purposively selected experts. We systematically searched for existing approaches for conceptualizing or assessing pharmaceutical systems and empirical studies in which these were applied and combined this with insights from 23 reviews and guidebooks suggested by experts to develop the LOPHAS approach and framework. We identified 13 existing frameworks and 16 studies that had applied these frameworks to analyse pharmaceutical systems. Building on these findings, we propose that a LOPHAS has six core functions: (1) local governance, (2) managing product supply, (3) financing, (4) developing human and physical resources, (5) appropriate dispensing and use of medicines and (6) monitoring performance. For each function, we defined operational components and indicators. The primary outcomes of a LOPHAS are access to medicine and appropriate use of medicine. The LOPHAS framework provides a practical tool for assessing and comparing the performance of LOPHAS. By identifying areas for improvement, it can guide policymakers, healthcare providers and local administrators in strengthening systems to ensure that essential medicines are accessible and used appropriately, supporting broader health goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.