ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Radiofrequency ablation with or without capecitabine maintenance therapy for lung oligometastases from colorectal cancer.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Capecitabine maintenance after radiofrequency ablation: A preventive strategy for lung oligometastases from colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo clear guidelines for long-term postoperative maintenance therapy have been established for patients with lung oligometastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) who achieve radiological no evidence of disease after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment. We compared the outcomes of patients with lung oligometastases from CRC after RFA plus maintenance capecitabine with RFA alone.
aimTo determine whether adding capecitabine to RFA improves prognosis compared with RFA alone.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients from two tertiary cancer centers treated for pulmonary oligometastases from CRC between 2016 and 2023. Subjects were assigned to RFA plus capecitabine (combined) or RFA alone (only RFA) groups. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) survival and the secondary outcome was local tumor progression (LTP). The OS, PFS, and LTP rates were compared between the two groups. In addition, prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsCombination therapy (RFA + capecitabine,
conclusionRFA prolongs survival and local control in patients with CRC pulmonary oligometastases. Adjuvant capecitabine increases OS and reduces LTP compared to RFA alone, but PFS did not significantly change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.