ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
High Conservation of Translation-Enabling RNA Editing Sites in Hyper-editing Ferns Implies They Are Not Selectively Neutral.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kingdom-wide evolutionary characterization of RNA editing factors in Archaeplastida.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Losing genes, gaining edits: how relaxed selection and inverted repeat expansion shape RNA editing in Schizaeaceae plastomes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Newly assembled mitochondrial genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA editing is essential for processing transcripts in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria. Levels of RNA editing vary between lineages, but some hornworts, lycophytes, and ferns have an extraordinary abundance of RNA editing. A feature of "hyper-editing" species is the prevalence of RNA editing events that promote translation by creating start codons or removing stop codons via C-to-U or U-to-C editing, respectively. These "translation-enabling" RNA editing events may play roles in regulating organelle gene expression. To investigate the importance of translation-enabling RNA editing events, we generated DNA and RNA sequence libraries for four Salviniales water ferns: Azolla rubra, Azolla pinnata, Marsilea mutica, and Salvinia molesta. We assembled chloroplast genomes, mitochondrial genes, and transcriptomes and identified RNA editing sites and candidate RNA editing factors. We reanalyzed sequence data of Azolla filiculoides and conducted a comparative analysis of RNA editing in chloroplasts and mitochondrial transcripts. Estimates of pyrimidine transition rates show that translation-enabling RNA editing sites are more conserved than other nonsynonymous editing sites, suggesting an emergent role in organelle gene expression that is not selectively neutral. This makes these events rare examples of RNA editing conferring adaptive advantage, in contrast to the prevailing view that RNA editing arises via constructive neutral evolutionary processes. Shotgun proteomics of M. mutica chloroplast thylakoid fractions verified the expected consequences of RNA editing on translation of chloroplast transcripts and implies that mechanisms exist to avoid translation of partially edited transcripts. Start codon editing may be one of those mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.