ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025
Systemic Treatment of Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata in Adults: Updated Australian Expert Consensus Statement.
Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of stepwise baricitinib tapering after complete response in alopecia areata: A real-world observational cohort study.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Real World Evidence in Alopecia Areata: Current Management, Emerging Therapies and Future Challenges - A Narrative Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 5000 patients are newly diagnosed with Alopecia areata (AA) in Australia each year. AA severity varies from a single small patch to complete loss of scalp hair, body hair including eyelashes and eyebrows. Approximately 40% of affected individuals experience only a single patch and achieve spontaneous, complete and durable remission within 6 months (acute AA). A further 27% develop additional patches but still attain complete remission within 12 months (chronic AA). Chronic persistent AA (CPAA) is defined by an episode duration of > 12 months and occurs in approximately 33% of patients. Without systemic treatment, 55% of individuals with CPAA will have persistent multifocal relapsing and remitting disease, 30% will progress to alopecia totalis (AT) and 15% will ultimately develop alopecia universalis (AU). The physical disfigurement, unpredictable course, social isolation and rejection contribute to the psychological distress attributable to AA. A wide range of topical, intralesional and systemic agents used to treat AA were evaluated in the 2018 Australian expert consensus statement. In 2020, the international Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts (ACE) publication stated that if reimbursed, Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi's) would be an ideal systemic treatment for adults with AA. TGA approval of baricitinib in 2023 and ritlecitinib in 2024 for severe AA is the first step on the pathway for these systemic medications to be reimbursed on the Australian Government Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Reimbursement would significantly transform the Australian therapeutic landscape for AA. The purpose of this 2025 Update on the Australian Expert Consensus Statement on the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe AA is to augment the 2018 treatment algorithm to include these TGA-approved medications and to address indications for initiation, continuation and dose titration of systemic JAKi treatment, appropriate choice of agent, satisfactory outcome measures and to provide guidance on when to discontinue successful or unsuccessful treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.