ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Effect of Contextual Interference and Differential Learning on Motor Skill Development and Motivation in Novice Basketball Players.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Minimally invasive suture training for resident, a pilot project: the MAESTRO project.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of Contextual Interference and Differential Learning on Motor Skill Development and Motivation in Novice Basketball Players.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of three practice orders in the contextual interference and differential learning frameworks on motivation and motor learning of novice basketball players. For this purpose, 84 female students were divided into seven groups (progressive practice-contextual interference framework, random practice-contextual interference framework, blocked practice-contextual interference framework, progressive variations-differential learning, stochastic variation-differential learning, predictable variation-differential learning, and control). After a pretest (18 trials), participants practiced the basketball jump shot for three consecutive days according to their grouping (3 blocks of 18 attempts each day). The contextual interference groups varied in shooting distances: random (different distance each trial), blocked (same distance all day), or progressive order (blocked first day, serial second day, random third day). The differential groups varied in body positions: random (unpredictable changes), blocked (predictable daily changes from head to foot), or progressive order (blocked first day, serial second day, random third day). After the last block of the third day of practice, participants completed the motivation questionnaire, as motivation can affect motor learning. Three days after the acquisition, participants performed two retention tests with fixed and variable targets. Additionally, a transfer test including 18 trials from a different distance was performed. Results indicated that the blocked practice-contextual interference group performed more accurately than other groups during acquisition. However, a higher transfer was observed for differential learning groups. Additionally, differential groups and random practice-contextual interference group showed higher motivation. These findings were discussed according to the role of noise in the exploration of the solution space of the task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.