Observational studyCancer biology & medicine2025
Evaluation of an intelligent digital platform for population management in cervical cancer screening.
Observational study in Cancer biology & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe temporal changes associated with deployment of an optical character recognition (OCR)-enabled One-Identity (One-ID) digital platform for rural cervical cancer screening, focusing on over-screening rates, CIN2+ detection, colposcopy follow-up, and CIN2+ management.
methodsA multi-county pre-post observational study was conducted in six rural counties in Shanxi, Yunnan, and Sichuan Provinces (2021-2024), encompassing 153,978 encounters. The digital platform integrates OCR identity capture, deterministic One-ID linkage, and real-time duplicate alerts. Over-screening proportions before and after digital deployment were compared, changes in CIN2+ detection rate were evaluated, and colposcopy follow-up and CIN2+ management were assessed. Differences were tested with χ
resultsAmong 153,978 encounters, the proportion of over-screening decreased from 12.64% in 2023 to 0.17% in 2024 with an absolute reduction of 12.17% (95% CI: 11.94-12.40;
conclusionsThe OCR-enabled One-ID platform substantially reduced over-screening, increased CIN2+ detection rate, and strengthened case follow-up/management, particularly where baseline tracking was weak, supporting scalable digital reinforcement of rural screening programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.