ArticleStudies in family planning2025
Evidence of Abortion Attitude Flexibility during COVID-19 in Pernambuco, Brazil.
Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence of Abortion Attitude Flexibility during COVID-19 in Pernambuco, Brazil.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines changes in women's attitudes toward abortion in Brazil during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the role of religious affiliation. Brazil provides a unique context for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, and back-to-back Zika and COVID-19 crises. We used data from a population-based sample of 2335 women ages 18-34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (May-September 2020) and one year later (May-September 2021). Multivariable-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess changes in support for abortion in cases of maternal Zika or COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Women were less supportive of abortion in the case of maternal COVID-19 infection (34 percent) compared to Zika infection (41 percent). About half of the women changed their abortion attitudes during the year. Pentecostal Evangelicals were more likely to decrease support, while nonreligious women or those with less conservative affiliations were more likely to increase support. Greater worry about Zika and COVID-19 was associated with higher support for abortion. The study highlights the dynamic nature of abortion attitudes, which should be considered when forming policies, especially during crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.