Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024608›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2025

Evidence of Abortion Attitude Flexibility during COVID-19 in Pernambuco, Brazil.

Brooke Whitfield, Raquel Zanatta Coutinho, Leticia Marteleto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raquel Zanatta Coutinho
Leticia Marteleto

Funding

Reproductive Responses to the Zika Virus Epidemic in BrazilR01HD091257 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Leticia J Marteleto · 2018 to 2026
$5.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines changes in women's attitudes toward abortion in Brazil during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the role of religious affiliation. Brazil provides a unique context for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, and back-to-back Zika and COVID-19 crises. We used data from a population-based sample of 2335 women ages 18-34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (May-September 2020) and one year later (May-September 2021). Multivariable-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess changes in support for abortion in cases of maternal Zika or COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Women were less supportive of abortion in the case of maternal COVID-19 infection (34 percent) compared to Zika infection (41 percent). About half of the women changed their abortion attitudes during the year. Pentecostal Evangelicals were more likely to decrease support, while nonreligious women or those with less conservative affiliations were more likely to increase support. Greater worry about Zika and COVID-19 was associated with higher support for abortion. The study highlights the dynamic nature of abortion attitudes, which should be considered when forming policies, especially during crises.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedCOVID-19Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultBrazilFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousReligionSARS-CoV-2Young AdultZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID41024608
PMCPMC12700129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.