Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024597›Full record

ArticleAnnals of geriatric medicine and research2025

Social Frailty in Older Adults: Proposal and Application of an Original Measurement Index.

Hernán-David García-Botina, Gloria-María Sierra-Hincapié

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hernán-David García-BotinaInternal Medicine and Medical Specialties Research Group, Pablo Tobón Uribe Hospital (GIMIEN-HPTU), Medellín, Colombia.
Gloria-María Sierra-HincapiéDepartment of Medicine, CESIM Mental Health Study Center, CES University, Medellín, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and apply a multidimensional Social Frailty Index (SFI) to estimate the prevalence of social frailty among older adults in four departments of Colombia.

methodsA cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted using secondary data from the 2016 Survey on Health, Well-being, and Aging (SABE Colombia). The study included 3,506 individuals aged 60 years and older residing in Antioquia, Caldas, Risaralda, and Quindío. Variables from demographic, health, and social domains were analyzed using principal component analysis to construct the SFI. Individuals scoring above the 75th percentile were classified as socially frail.

resultsThe prevalence of social frailty was 25.3% (95% confidence interval, 23.8-26.7), with higher rates observed among men (29.2%) and individuals aged 75 years and older (32.4%), as well as among residents of Antioquia. Four latent components were identified: functional dependence; social engagement and participation; social and emotional isolation; and perceived health and healthcare quality. The index showed consistency with theoretical frameworks and international tools.

conclusionThis multidimensional index allows for early identification of vulnerable older adults, supporting targeted interventions and public health planning. Further research is needed to standardize measurement criteria and to evaluate the predictive value of social frailty in relation to outcomes such as disability, multimorbidity, mortality, and quality of life.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentSocial IsolationAgedAged, 80 and overColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocial ParticipationAgedFrail older adultsFrailtySocial IsolationSocial vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID41024597
PMCPMC12766308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.