ArticleThe FEBS journal2026
Phylogenetic reconciliation provides new insights into the evolutionary diversification of the glutamine synthetase gene family in seed plants.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glutamine synthetase genes family mediates nitrogen metabolism and disease responses in Kentucky bluegrass.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glutamine synthetase (GS) catalyzes the incorporation of ammonium into glutamate, a crucial reaction in nitrogen metabolism. Despite advances in plant genomics, the evolutionary relationships among GS isoforms in seed plants remain incompletely understood. In this study, we selected 155 GS genes from 45 phylogenetically well-characterized seed plant species. Our analyses consistently support the existence of three distinct evolutionary lineages of GS genes in seed plants: GS2 (chloroplastic), and GS1a and GS1b (cytosolic). Using a Bayesian molecular clock dating approach, we estimate that GS2 diverged approximately 560 million years ago, whereas GS1a and GS1b began to diverge around 70 million years later. Additionally, we developed orthgs, a software tool that implements tree reconciliation and enables analyses of orthology and paralogy among GS enzymes. Phylogenetic reconciliation offers new insights into the evolutionary dynamics of the GS gene family in plants, revealing the existence of new paralogs of GS1a and GS2. Most of the genomes analyzed contain multiple paralogs of GS1b, whereas GS1a and GS2 appear as singleton genes. Although these single-copy genes have traditionally been considered orthologs, we present evidence challenging this assumption. Thus, our findings suggest that both GS1a and GS2 have undergone multiple duplication events throughout evolutionary history, similar to GS1b. However, unlike GS1b, only a single paralog of GS1a (or GS2) is retained per genome. Overall, our study reshapes the understanding of GS gene family evolution in seed plants by uncovering hidden duplication events in GS1a and GS2, highlighting dynamic evolutionary patterns previously overlooked in this gene family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.