Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024395›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2026

Root-Pore Interactions, the Underestimated Driver for Rhizosphere Structure and Rhizosheath Development.

Maik Geers-Lucas, Andrey Guber, Alexandra Kravchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rhizosheath-Mycorrhizal Interactions inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maik Geers-LucasInstitute of Ecology, Chair of Soil Science, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-7666
Andrey GuberDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Alexandra KravchenkoDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-927X

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Number DE-SC0018409, by the NSF DEB Program (Award #1904267), by the NSF LTER Program (DEB 1027253) at the Kellogg Biological Station, and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical characteristics of rhizosphere and rhizosheath, that is, root-adhering soil, are crucial for plant performance. Yet, the drivers of the rhizosphere's structural properties and their relationships with rhizosheath development remain unclear. We used X-ray computed micro-tomography (i) to explore two drivers of rhizosphere porosity: root-induced changes vs. preferential root growth into soil with certain pore characteristics and (ii) to estimate their contributions to rhizosphere macroporosity gradients and rhizosheath formation. Rhizosheath development was assessed in relation to rhizosphere macroporosity and rhizodeposition after ¹⁴C labeling. Our results confirmed that both root-induced changes and growth preferences shape rhizosphere structure, with their relative significance depending on the inherent macropore availability. In intact soils, growth preferences were the dominant factor, while in sieved soils the root-induced changes became equally important. Rhizosheath formation was associated with roots compacting their surrounding and releasing carbon. However, no correlation was found between rhizosheath formation and the actual rhizosphere, that is, the volume of soil adjacent to the roots. The study offers new process-level understanding of rhizosphere porosity gradients, while emphasizing caution in interpreting root growth data from sieved soil studies. Similarly, traditional destructively sampled rhizosheath may not fully capture the true characteristics of the actual rhizosphere, underscoring importance of intact-soil analyses.

Indexed as

Plant RootsRhizospherePorositySoilX-Ray MicrotomographySoilmacroporosity gradientsrhizosheathrhizosphere self‐organizationroot growth preferencesroot‐pore interactionsX‐ray CT

Identifiers

PMID41024395
PMCPMC12675988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.