Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024307›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2025

Effectiveness of digital interventions on relationship satisfaction among couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lívia Kernová, Júlia Halamová, Denis Deriglazov

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lívia KernováInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynské luhy 4, Bratislava, 821 05, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6814-980X
Júlia HalamováInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynské luhy 4, Bratislava, 821 05, Slovakia. julia.halamova@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2327
Denis DeriglazovInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynské luhy 4, Bratislava, 821 05, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8136-4846

Funding

Comenius University in Bratislava Grant UK/1117/2024the EU NextGenerationEU through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Slovakia 09I03-03-V04-00258the Vedecká grantová agentúra VEGA 1/0054/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relationship satisfaction not only contributes to overall life satisfaction and well-being but also has a positive impact on both physical and mental health. The benefits of online interventions for couples include the circumvention of key barriers to traditional therapy. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to evaluate randomized controlled trials to determine the effectiveness of digital technology-based interventions in improving romantic relationship satisfaction. The aim of the meta-analysis is to quantify the effectiveness of these interventions on relationship satisfaction. Most of the 15 eligible studies reviewed obtained significant results in improving relationship satisfaction, and these effects were often sustained at follow-up. A meta-analysis of six studies revealed a significant, moderate effect size. However, the detected heterogeneity points to variability in intervention effectiveness, which may be attributable to differences in program design, participant population, and delivery method. Digital-based interventions are particularly promising for enhancing relationship satisfaction in couples.

Indexed as

Couples TherapyInterpersonal RelationsPersonal SatisfactionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDigital interventionsEffectivenessMeta-analysisRelationship satisfactionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41024307
PMCPMC12482273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.