ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Exploring the challenges faced by generic version of complex drugs: a scoping review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Side Effect: Immuno-Ethical Risk Analysis of Animal-Derived Ingredients in Pharmaceuticals.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex generics can be defined by their complex active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, dosage forms, routes of administration, and drug device combinations which significantly pose challenges in scientific advancement and regulatory approvals. The present review aims to investigate, identify, and classify the critical challenges faced by different stakeholders and the strategies adopted to address these challenges across the developmental stage till the post-approval phases of complex generics.
methodWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Scoping Reviews Extension for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines for the systematic search conducted across various databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1, 2014, to August 22, 2024). English language articles that addressed various challenges as well as innovative strategic approaches were included in the study. Two authors independently reviewed the retrieved papers to reduce the possibility of bias. The screening was performed based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
resultsA total of 1718 studies were retrieved from the database searches, from which 24 met the eligibility criteria. The selected articles were from the USA, the European Union, India, Russia, Taiwan, China, and Malaysia. The formulation challenges (17 articles), analytical challenges (19 articles), clinical challenges (18 articles), critical process parameter-related challenges (17 articles), critical quality attribute-related challenges (19 articles), and regulatory challenges (21 articles) were the major challenges of complex generics. The use of advanced sophisticated analytical equipment as well as orthogonal bioanalytical testing, the implementation of a dynamic regulatory cross-checking system, the development and use of machine learning and artificial intelligence tools, and the development of quality-by-design approaches and models have been recognized as the best methods for addressing these challenges.
conclusionThis review addresses critical gap by providing a systematic summary of stakeholder-reported barriers and novel mitigation approaches in the complex generics domain. It highlights the urgent need for harmonized global regulatory guidelines, advance analytical tools, and strategic stakeholder collaboration to hasten the development and availability of high-quality complex generics. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review was not registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.