Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024263›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Quality control of ultrasound at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation: results from the China Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Cohort.

Jingjing Wang, Wenjia Lei, Yantong Zhu, Na Zhang, Shijing Song, Li Wang, Qingqing Wu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingjing WangClinical Trial Institution Office, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
Wenjia LeiDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
Yantong ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
Na ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
Shijing SongDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
Li WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
Qingqing WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China. qingqingwu@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC2703300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the quality control (QC) of ultrasound scanning at 11-14 weeks of gestation during the first stage in the China Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Cohort (CEPUC).

methodsA stratified random sampling strategy was employed for QC on ultrasound images from 525 single fetuses between 11 and 13

resultsThe median number of retained ultrasound scans per person was 16.0 (interquartile range: 15.0-17.0). The median scores for self-QC and second QC were 44 points (interquartile range: 40-47) and 43 points (interquartile range: 38-46), respectively. The second QC scores were significantly lower than the self-QC scores (P < 0.001), with 225 cases (42.9%) scoring lower and 280 cases (53.3%) scoring equally. Excluding image magnification, the three items with the lowest scoring rates among the other 37 were: (1) coronal view of the cervical spine to the sacrum (62.3%), (2) assessing regurgitation in the tricuspid valve spectrum of the heart (63.4%), and (3) obtaining a three-dimensional (3D) image of the choroid plexus Sect. (78.1%).

conclusionsQC in ultrasound is crucial for multicenter cohort studies, ensuring consistency and reliability across various sites. Both subjective and objective measurements should be seriously considered.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, PrenatalAdultChinaCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstQuality ControlEarly pregnancyFetusQuality controlUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41024263
PMCPMC12482272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.