ArticleGenome medicine2025
Adult genomic medicine: lessons from a multisite study of 2700 patients.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The NeuroWES project: lessons learned from comprehensive phenotyping and genetic analysis of neurodevelopmental disorders over a decade.Human genetics · 2026Article
- A genomics health strategy for the Arabian Gulf.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Bi-allelic variants in OLA1 cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with joint hypermobility.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Recessive genomic and phenotypic variation in consanguineous families with cerebral palsy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical exome and genome sequencing has transformed the diagnostic workup of patients with genetic disorders. The extensive body of evidence supporting the application of this clinical genomics approach in pediatric patients stands in stark contrast to the relative paucity of evidence for its use in the adult population. Here, we describe the largest cohort to date of adult patients who underwent clinical exome and genome sequencing for suspected genetic diagnoses.
methodsA total of 2763 adult patients (2529 families) from all regions of Saudi Arabia are included in this cohort (2202 exomes, and 561 genomes).
resultsThe diagnostic rate is 38.9% spanning 535 Mendelian genes and revealing clinical diagnostic errors in 38% of patients with positive reports. Structured feedback using C-GUIDE demonstrates clinical utility in 90% of positive cases. Consistent with the highly consanguineous nature of the local population, the majority (61%) of diagnosed phenotypes are recessive (94.6% homozygous) and founder variants account for 85% (414/487) of these variants. The same population characteristic has also led to the encounter of extremely rare, even novel recessive disorders including a highly penetrant novel RNF43-related hemochromatosis, NFXL1-related syndrome of hyperlaxity, short stature, and kidney disease, as well as autosomal recessive forms of typically dominant disorders. Multilocus phenotypes are observed in 5% of cases although only 26.7% of these are caused by two recessive variants. That 70% of molecular diagnoses encountered in our cohort are typically described in pediatric patients allowed us to observe highly unusual clinical presentations in the adult population. This delayed diagnosis also represents a missed opportunity for effective treatment in many instances and we note the availability of treatment for 26% of diagnosed conditions. Of particular interest are patients with monogenic disorders that could be overlooked as common multifactorial adult diseases (e.g., diabetes, dyslipidemia, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and dementia). Finally, we note the opportunities of deploying adult clinical genomics in an underrepresented population where 45.5% (373/819) of encountered variants are completely absent in gnomAD.
conclusionsOur results illustrate numerous benefits of a clinical genomics approach in adult medicine and argue for a broader implementation than currently practiced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.