Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024226›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Examining a structural equation model of peace of mind, gratitude, and positive reappraisal in predicting psychological well-being among college students.

Wei Du, Limin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei DuPsychological Health Education and Counseling Center, Jiaozuo Normal College, Jiaozuo, 454000, China.
Limin LiuPsychological Health Education and Counseling Center, Jiaozuo Normal College, Jiaozuo, 454000, China. jiaotangdu@sina.com.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the program of Philosophy and Social Science in Henan Province. 2023BKS020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the relationships among gratitude, positive reappraisal, peace of mind, and psychological well-being, with a focus on their roles in being associated with mental health among Chinese college students. A cross-sectional design was employed, with 336 undergraduate students from various disciplines recruited through convenience sampling from four universities in mainland China. Participants completed validated self-reported measures of gratitude (GQ-6), positive reappraisal (CERQ), peace of mind (PoMS), psychological well-being (SPWB), and perceived academic pressure. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the construct validity of the scales, and structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed significant direct effects of gratitude, positive reappraisal, and peace of mind on psychological well-being. Additionally, peace of mind was found to mediate the relationships between gratitude, positive reappraisal, and well-being, suggesting that emotional stability and inner tranquility are important pathways to enhanced mental health. Clinically, these findings underscore the potential for integrating gratitude and positive reappraisal into therapeutic interventions to cultivate peace of mind and support mental health outcomes. Such interventions could be particularly valuable for students navigating high-pressure academic environments.

Indexed as

EmotionsMental HealthPersonal SatisfactionStudentsAdolescentAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleModels, PsychologicalPsychological Well-BeingSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesCollege studentsGratitudeMental healthPeace of mindPositive reappraisalPsychological well-beingStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID41024226
PMCPMC12482322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.