ArticleConflict and health2025
A review of the performance of the early warning alert and response system (EWARS) in conflict-affected Borno State, Nigeria: a five-year descriptive analysis.
Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surveillance without silos: a One Health data imperative for avian influenza in West Africa.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe northeastern region of Nigeria has been experiencing a protracted humanitarian crisis, characterized by conflict, displacement, and a severely disrupted health system. The Early Warning Alert and Response System (EWARS) was implemented in 2016 to strengthen disease surveillance in this challenging context.
methodsThis study employed a descriptive design to evaluate the performance of EWARS in Borno State, Nigeria, over a five-year period (2016-2021). The data sources included weekly health facility reports and the EWARS alert log. Key performance indicators, including timeliness and completeness of reporting, were analyzed.
resultsEWARS coverage expanded significantly, reaching 341 health facilities across 25 local government areas. The timeliness of reporting ranged from 6 to 85%, with a median of 65.5% (95% CI: 59-73%). A statistically significant positive Pearson correlation was observed between timeliness and the duration of implementation (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). Completeness of reporting ranged from 42 to 96%, with a median of 68% (95% CI: 62.0-76.25%) and a weaker but significant positive correlation (r = 0.19, p < 0.001). A total of 13,737 alerts were generated, of which 89.6% were verified within 24 hours. However, only 0.1% required an immediate public health response. While systematically recorded data on response activities were limited, verified alerts-particularly for measles and cholera-reportedly triggered vaccination campaigns, case investigations, and WASH interventions.
conclusionsThe EWARS system demonstrated significant operational value in strengthening disease surveillance and triggering early warning alerts in the conflict-affected Borno State. Despite not meeting all national performance targets, the system showed improvements over time and supported early detection and verification of potential outbreaks. Its utility as a first-line surveillance tool is evident, though future efforts should prioritize integrating response documentation and event-based surveillance components to strengthen public health impact assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.