SynthesisBMC psychology2025
A systematic review of counselling approaches and their impact on marital intimacy among women and couples experiencing infertility.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- China-East Asia comparison of male infertility burden and trend prediction: evidence from GBD 2023.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in Dyadic Coping Among Infertile Couples and Its Association with Depression and Fertility Quality of Life: A Latent Profile Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfertility-related stress adversely affects marital intimacy, decreases self-esteem, and decreases the rate of sexual contact. In consideration of the psychological distress and marital issues confronted by individuals with infertility, developing strategies that foster an intimate marital life is essential. This study reviewed counselling approaches and their impact on marital intimacy among women and couples experiencing infertility.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020. The search of studies was performed through databases such as Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Google Scholar search engine without time limitations until 16th July, 2025, using MeSH keywords of ((infertility OR infertile OR subfertile OR sterility OR subfertility OR childlessness)AND (“counselling” OR “psychosocial intervention” OR “psychological intervention” OR psychological OR “couples therapy” OR therapy OR psychotherapy) AND (“Marital intimacy” OR intimacy)). All randomized controlled trials and quasiexperimental studies regarding the effects of infertility counselling interventions on the marital intimacy of women and couples experiencing infertility were assessed by two independent researchers for quality via the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist.
resultsOut of 1649 studies retrieved from physical and electronic resources, 14 studies including a total of 550 patients were systematically reviewed in this study. The results revealed that various types of infertility counselling interventions, including self-regulatory couple therapy, group therapy on the basis of quality of life, relationship enrichment training, group counselling on acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological intervention, positive couple therapy program, reality therapy, Gottman couple-centered counselling, emotion-focused couple therapy and integrated behavioral approach improve marital intimacy.
conclusionDespite the positive effect of counselling interventions on marital intimacy in infertile couples, owing to the inability to conduct a meta-analysis, there is a need for more robust clinical trials to provide sufficient clinical evidence in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.