ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Gauze detection and segmentation in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multi-center study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical gauze is commonly used in laparoscopic procedures. However, due to its small size, limited visibility to the naked eye, and subtle tactile presence, gauze can easily be overlooked during surgery. PURPOSE: To support surgeons in detecting gauze, reduce the risk of omission, and enhance surgical safety and efficiency, we developed a deep learning framework designed to identify gauze in laparoscopic liver surgeries.
methodsIn total, 33 laparoscopic liver surgery videos were collected from 2 hospitals and used as internal and external datasets. Deep learning models were trained on individual video frames to detect and segment gauze, with each frame containing one or more gauze objects. To better evaluate model performance, we introduced a quantitative approach that classified gauze detection difficulty into three categories: easy, moderate, and difficult. Model performance across categories was assessed using data from both centers.
resultsAmong the tested models, YOLOv8n achieved the highest accuracy in gauze detection. In the internal test set, recall and precision reached 0.8443 and 0.9034, while in the external test set, they were 0.8289 and 0.9103. For gauze segmentation, the FCN-ResNet101 model demonstrated superior performance, achieving Dice scores of 0.9389 in the internal test set and 0.9081 in the external test set.
conclusionThe findings highlight the strong capability of the proposed framework to detect and segment gauze across varying levels of background complexity in laparoscopic liver surgery videos. This approach has the potential to significantly improve gauze management during surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.