ArticleBMC nursing2025
From bedside to system change: the TRIL nurse advocacy model for sustainable healthcare.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvocacy is a key professional responsibility of nurses. Yet, there is a dearth of frameworks grounded in nursing practice that articulate this role, particularly in driving sustainable change.
aimThis study aimed to describe the diverse forms and strategies used in nurse-led advocacy, to develop a conceptual framework for fostering sustainable healthcare practices and nurse-led change from the bedside to the system-level.
methodA descriptive qualitative design was used to describe how nurse-led advocacy is manifested in the stories of RCN-UK ‘Nurse of the Year’ 2016–2023 awardees. The Framework Method was applied to analyse seven publicly available nurse-led advocacy initiatives. The analysis involved familiarisation, identification of a thematic framework, indexing, charting, mapping and interpretation to synthesise key advocacy dimensions.
findingsThe analysis resulted in the development of the TRIL Nurse Advocacy Model. This novel thematic framework posits that nurse-led advocacy comprises three interconnected pillars: Transformative Action, Relational Co-design and Institutional Legacy. Transformative action highlights the nurses’ capacity for crisis-responsive innovations, people-centred transformations, advancing health equity, and revisioning practice standards. Relational Co-design underscores the importance of cross-sector partnership, community-led empowerment, and workforce inspiration. Institutional Legacy emphasises the critical role of policy and resource formalisation, and sustainable system integration in ensuring lasting impact. The model also recognises the reality of the context of barriers, which underscores the need for strategic navigation to overcome systemic resistance, thereby creating sustainable healthcare.
conclusionThe TRIL Nurse Advocacy Model provides a comprehensive lens for advancing nurse-led advocacy. It offers significant implications for nursing education by guiding curriculum development to cultivate advocacy skills. It also impacts policy by highlighting the contributions of nurses to systemic change, and in practice, by empowering nurses to strategically plan and evaluate their initiatives toward building resilient and sustainable healthcare systems. CLINIC TRAIL NUMBER: Not applicable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.