ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Intelligent prediction of dynamic characteristics during exercise in patients with stroke.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of lower limb kinetic characteristics is critical for evaluating gait impairments and guiding rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Traditional three-dimensional (3D) optical motion capture systems provide high-precision measurements but are costly, require a laboratory environment, and are sensitive to marker placement errors. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, combined with machine learning models, may offer a portable and clinically feasible alternative.
methodsThirty patients with stroke performed level walking and stair negotiation tasks while wearing IMU sensors. Joint kinematic data derived from the IMUs were processed using principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction, and lower limb joint torques were predicted using a backpropagation (BP) neural network. The proposed Principal Component Analysis - Back Propagation (PCA-BP) model was evaluated using normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R²).
resultsThe PCA-BP model achieved high prediction accuracy for hip, knee, and ankle joint torques across sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes during both walking and stair tasks. Performance metrics indicated good agreement between predicted values and those obtained from OpenSim simulations based on IMU-derived kinematics.
conclusionIMU-based gait analysis in patients with stroke demonstrated the potential to serve as an alternative to traditional 3D optical motion capture systems, particularly in non-laboratory or resource-limited settings. This approach offers portability and practicality for sports scientists and clinicians, supporting its potential integration into routine clinical rehabilitation assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.