Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41024088›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Integrating big data and artificial intelligence to predict progression in multiple sclerosis: challenges and the path forward.

Hamza Khan, Sofie Aerts, Ilse Vermeulen, Henry C Woodruff, Philippe Lambin, Liesbet M Peeters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamza KhanBiomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), University MS Center, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building C, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Sofie AertsBiomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), University MS Center, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building C, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Ilse VermeulenBiomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), University MS Center, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building C, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Henry C WoodruffThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Philippe Lambin *The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Liesbet M Peeters *Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), University MS Center, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building C, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium. liesbet.peeters@uhasselt.be.

Funding

Special Research Fund of Hasselt University BOF19DOCMA10Special Research Fund of Hasselt University BOF22DOC18Stichting MS Research 19-1040 MS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a complex and costly neurological condition characterised by progressive disability, making early detection and accurate prognosis of disease progression imperative. While artificial intelligence (AI) combined with big data promises transformative advances in personalised MS care, integration of multimodal, real-world datasets, including clinical records, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital biomarkers, remains limited. This perspective paper identifies a critical gap between technical innovation and clinical implementation, driven by methodological constraints, evolving regulatory frameworks, and ethical concerns related to bias, privacy, and equity. We explore this gap through three interconnected lenses: the underuse of integrated real-world data, the barriers posed by regulation and ethics, and emerging solutions. Promising strategies such as federated learning, regulatory initiatives like DARWIN-EU and the European Health Data Space, and patient-led frameworks including PROMS and CLAIMS, offer structured pathways forward. Additionally, we highlight the growing relevance of foundation models for interpreting complex MS data and supporting clinical decision-making. We advocate for harmonised data infrastructures, patient-centred design, explainable AI, and real-world validation as core pillars for future implementation. By aligning technical, regulatory, and ethical domains, stakeholders can unlock the full potential of AI to enhance prognosis, personalise care, and improve outcomes for people with MS.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBig DataDisease ProgressionMultiple SclerosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisArtificial intelligenceBig dataDisability progressionEthicsEU regulationsMultimodal integrationMultiple sclerosisRadiomicsReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID41024088
PMCPMC12482038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.